Dean is well aware of research that proves the opposite.
教務長是很好察覺研究那個證明這相對的.
I doubt he mentions it.
我懷疑他提及它.
You all might find the following interesting:
你全部勢力找尋這下面有趣的:
NCGR [National Council for Geocosmic Research] Journal, Winter 1986-87, pages pages 29-43.
NCGR [National 會議為了Geocosmic Research] 日記,冬天1986-87,頁頁29-43.
Self Selection of Astrologically Derived Personality Descriptions: An Emperical Test of the Relationship between Astrology and Psychology -- by Neil Z.
自我選擇的占星衍生人格描述:一Emperical 試驗的這有關係的在..之間星象和心理學--經由(被)Neil Z.
Marbell, Angela R.
Marbell,Angela R.
Novak, Laird W.
Novak,地主W.
Heal, Land D.
治愈,孔環焊墊(表面(方型)焊墊)D.
Fleming and Jeannine Marie Burton.
法蘭得斯人和Jeannine Marie 小型滑車裝置.
Note: Before Marbell did the study, he collected letters approving the study and methodology (which are published with the study) from the following worthies: Paul Kurtz (Chairman of CSICOP [Commitee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal] ), George Abel (Prof.
筆記:之前Marbell 做這學習,他收集成文字核准這學習和方法論(哪個是出版和這學習)從這下面worthies:保羅Kurtz(主席的CSICOP [Commitee 為了這科學的調查的要求的這Paranormal]),喬治亞伯(教授.
of Astronomy UCLA and author of the Nobel Laureates against Astrology statement) David Kanouse, Contemporary Research Inc.
的天文學UCLA 和作者的這諾貝爾獎得獎人反抗星象陳述)大衛Kanouse,當代研究有限公司.
(who designed the experiment with Abel), and two members of Congress.
(誰設計好的這實驗和亞伯),和二會員的眾議院.
Methodological Review and Assistance was provided by:--- Allen I.
方法論再檢查和援助是倘若經由(被):---Allen 我.
Teger, Boston University Richard C.
兩歲的羊,波士頓大學理查C.
Atkinson, Cal State Eloise E.
Atkinson,Cal 狀況Eloise E.
Clark, National Science Foundation George C.
克拉克,國民科學創立喬治C.
Pimentel, National Science Foundation Richard T.
Pimentel,國民科學創立理查T.
Louttit, National Science Foundation Roland W.
Louttit,國民科學創立勇強W.
Radloff, National Science Foundation Leonard Hommel, Cal State Hon.
Radloff,國民科學創立連納德Hommel,Cal 狀況愛人.
Jerome Ambro, US.S.
Jerome Ambro,US.S.
Congress Hon.
眾議院愛人.
Phillip m.
Phillip m.
Crain, US Congress Paul Kurtz, CSICOP
Crain,美國眾議院保羅Kurtz,CSICOP
Statistical Assistance by--- Douglas Bates, Univ.
統計學援助by--- 道格拉斯緩和,Univ.
of Wisconsin Walter Flom, Univ.
的威斯康辛州Walter Flom,Univ.
of Wisconsin Pamela Giese, US Dept.
的威斯康辛州Pamela Giese,美國Dept.
of National Resources Lillian Celic and Randall Bohnert, NCGR Albert Cover, Synapse
的國民資源Lillian Celic 和Randall Bohnert,NCGR 愛爾伯特電信機覆蓋,突觸
Now let me quote a portion of the overall results:
現在讓我引用一份這工作服結果:
"Results indicate that subjects do agree with descriptions of their personalities generated by astrologers from birth chart information alone.
"結果指出那個主題做贊同描述的他們的人格產生經由(被)星相學有生以來圖資訊孤單.
More importantly, they can select their own personality description from among several; when offered a choice from several (i.e., three) personality descriptions, they will select their own and reject others much more frequently than chance alone would indicate.
更多重要,他們能選擇他們自己的人格描述從在中間幾個;什麼時候提出一選擇從幾個(就是,三)人格描述,他們將選擇他們自己的和被拒絕的其他的更加時常比偶然孤單將會指出.
In line with previous research which has indicated a tendency for subjects to affirm even vague personality characteristics, subjects in this study did agree more often than they disagreed with specific personality descriptions; however, very importantly, they also rejected a significant portion of personality characteristics describing other people."
依照先前研究哪個有指出一傾向為了主題到斷言甚至不明確人格特性,主題在這學習做一致更多常常比他們不同意和指定人格描述;然而,非常重要,他們也被拒絕的一重要部份的人格特性描述其他的people."
When Marbell launched this enterprise, I was rather concerned.
什麼時候Marbell 發射這企業,我是恰當掛慮.
He wanted to do it with pre-approval from dedicated anti-astrology forces who could only hope to ballyhoo anything but outstanding results in astrology's favor.
他想要到做這件事和pre-approval 從專注的anti-astrology 力量誰能唯一希望大肆宣傳絕非顯著的結果在星象的恩惠.
That's what Marbell got, outstanding results in astrology's favor with pre approved by the enemy of his methodology -- they even designed the experiment.
那是什麼Marbell 得到,顯著的結果在星象的恩惠和pre 被認可經由(被)這敵人的他的方法論--他們甚至設計好的這實驗.
What he couldn't get was column space in Science, Scientific American or any other mainstream publication.
什麼他未能獲得是圓柱行間在科學,科學的美語或任一其他的主流出版.
--Mary Downing
--Mary向下
救命喔~~~
翻完還是看不懂~~~
排盤小幫手
前一個議題
索引
