誰說的，朱利安尼都說，媒體比法律大嗎？

新任總統要國會認可才是正式的，去到國會還有一連串好戲，而且有官司在身可以宣哲嗎，川普會順利交個權力嗎？

有人明知事要敗了，狗急跳牆，想玩黃袍加身，成既定事實，看看有誰認他

我 quote 的是 CNN
拜登馬上要發表 victory speech
共享之

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/trey-trainor-fec-trump-2020-election/2020/11/06/id/995772/

美國聯邦選舉委員會主席：選舉舞弊正在發生，大選是「非法的」


Trey Trainor to Newsmax TV: Voter Fraud Is Taking Place

Chair of the Federal Election Commission Trey Trainor believes voter fraud is taking place in states still counting ballots.

During a Friday appearance on Newsmax TV’s “National Report,” Trainor said locations not granting observers access to watch the ballot counting process could be involved in voter fraud.

“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” he said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”

Despite winning a court order, which allows the Trump campaign to send observers to watch ballot counting in Pennsylvania from six feet away, Trainor said ballot watchers “have not been allowed into the polling locations in a meaningful way.”

He said when observers have been permitted to watch, the goalpost has been moved away from the six feet required by the court order.

“They have not been allowed that meaningful access,” he said, adding there has not been transparency in the election.

“Our whole political system is based upon transparency to avoid the appearance of corruption,” he said pointing out that Pennsylvania and other states are not conducting counting in a transparent manner.

“State law allows those observers to be in there,” he said, adding if the law isn’t being followed then this election is “illegitimate.”

He said the lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign are “very valid allegations” that need to be “fully vetted” by the court system. He predicts some of the legal challenges will likely end up in the Supreme Court.

See Newsmax TV now carried in 70 million cable homes, on DirecTV Ch. 349, Dish Network Ch. 216, Xfinity Ch. 1115, Spectrum, U-verse Ch. 1220, FiOS Ch. 615, Optimum Ch. 102, Cox cable, Suddenlink Ch. 102, CenturyLink 1209, Mediacom Ch. 277, Frontier 615 or

© 2020 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

現在拜登贏了嗎, 他自己宣佈勝選又如何, 有人認嗎?

美選管會主席說了, 大選是非法的

我重申一次, 就好象你認為這卦怎樣...煩到我都不想聽你廢語了(拜登自己說是總統)

不關我事, 我絕對不認同你(川普絕不認同今次選舉)一樣

你說服不了我, 你也不聽我的, 川普拜登就看法庭判啦, 你我窆留言其他的各位網友自有公論

"“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” he said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”"

您可能要看一下這句話, 主席說不給監票的話, 他就認為選票欺詐存在.

全文有哪一句話說 "大選是非法的"???

很會偷換概念, 說理而言也太過於勉強

我不是Bold了嗎

“State law allows those observers to be in there,” he said, adding if the law isn’t being followed then this election is “illegitimate.”

現在已經有很多共和黨監票員出來作供了, 民主黨把持的點票中心, 不讓他們在合理距離監票

2000年高爾與布希間的訴訟,一直打到12/12日.這一次只有媒體在喊贏了,但國會與大法官那邊還沒承認呢!

大家都把卦跟八字當命定論
這跟真理相違背
其實命非定數
了解這樣才能學好卦

以這卦而言
用常識是選舉當日就決定結果
但今年因新冠肺炎
郵寄投票變多
且很多因為氣川普讓新冠大為失控
故郵寄一面倒向拜登
導致第二天就翻盤
完全與卦的流月日吻合

https://destiny.to/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/2107650#Post2107650

當美國人極力懺悔
就可能挽救世界受大力的審判
讓川普落選
(川普只講個人及自己的國家利益 可以說是標準的敵基督)

如果我知道選舉日當天不會有結果
我就會依流月日來斷
這哪有斷錯之說

英、德、加等國领袖都恭喜 Biden。真係全世界都認。

但有部份人始终活在幻想中，垂死挣扎。

用傻侵的斗數盤，共和党元老唔支持佢，白宫人員疏離傻侵。外国元首賀拜登。真係人情冷暖。

你都傻的, 外人認有何法律效力, 如你鄰居認你家是他的又如何, 真攪笑

https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/trey-trainor-fec-trump-2020-election/2020/11/06/id/995772/

美國聯邦選舉委員會主席：選舉舞弊正在發生，大選是「非法的」

香港人好了啦

執政黨講人作弊是可笑的

對, 你知唔知作弊州執政黨都係民主黨, 唔知唔好走出黎柒啦, 美國大選選務都係由各州內各自安排, 有好大權去出術

依加證人上千個, 搵450,000票疑似假票, 咪上庭睇法官點判啦

參議院司法委員會已經開始啟動調查今次大選作弊啦, 唔係話參議院冇實權吧, 拜登只係媒體聲稱的, 要參眾兩院確認, 依加咁多官司, 參議院又係共和黨控制, 你唔係以為過到啊

賓州眾議院已要求對今次選舉全面審計, 總之呢次選舉審計同調查會愈攪愈大, 拜登想贏, 屁都冇, 佢2022年會有排煩, 因為查到佢都要再一年

個d小粉紅話共和黨離棄川普, 都係某部分唔公開, 最多唔出錢支持吧, 係參議院現任議員係國會已經聲名力挺, 即係話未有調查結果唔使止意過參議院, 冇參議院確認, 邊個都做唔到總統

依拜登驚到瀨屎啦

Trump and GOP lawsuits challenging election flail in court
By Katelyn Polantz, Erica Orden, Laura Jarrett and Jessica Schneider, CNN

(CNN)The Trump campaign and President Donald Trump peppered Thursday with tweets and news conferences boasting of success in courts as states continue to count ballots, but the legal efforts repeatedly failed to gain traction or affect significant enough numbers of votes, if any, in key states.

Several of the active cases centered on Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, specifically, where vote counters throughout the day continued to tally numbers of absentee ballots that cut Trump's lead in the state dramatically.

Trump's few wins in court have largely been on procedural measures on issues that could affect minuscule numbers of ballots, or like in one Pennsylvania case, about relatively inconsequential issues such as allowing campaign canvass observers to stand slightly closer to ballot processers. In several courts in recent days, judges have been exasperated with the Trump campaign and Republicans' arguments.
In one case the Trump campaign filed in federal court on Thursday in Pennsylvania, Judge Paul Diamond, a George W. Bush appointee, set a tone almost immediately with sarcasm, telling the Trump campaign lawyer, "Well, you have your hearing."

By the end of the hearing, the Trump campaign lawyer had admitted, contrary to his initial complaint, that observers for the campaign were in the room to watch ballot canvassing in Philadelphia.
The judge asked Philadelphia city officials to confirm Democrats and Republicans were being treated fairly to watch the ballot-counting and that they were allowed to watch the counting in the city from 6 feet away. He noted the case appeared to be an appeal of a state issue -- making it completely out of place for a federal court to handle.
When the Trump campaign lawyer spoke up to say he had "another problem" with the ballot observation, Diamond, the judge, cut him off, asking, "Length and width? Time and place?"
When the judge pressed the Trump campaign lawyer on if there were observers in the room from the campaign, the lawyer, Jerome Marcus, said: "There's a non-zero number of people in the room."
At another point, when Marcus handed the judge a hand-drawn map of the ballot counting room, Diamond cracked that the lawyer should keep his day job.

It wasn't the first sketch of a map introduced this week. In a Nevada Supreme Court case filed on Election Day, lawyers representing the Trump campaign similarly submitted a hand-drawn map of a ballot processing room as evidence -- an unusual approach in any case.
Election lawsuits filed on Election Day often have some air of informality, given the need for quick action. But several election law experts have been critical of the lack of serious legal arguments that representatives of the Trump campaign are making in recent days -- with some court filings not even containing evidence or assertions of fact at all.
In other states where the vote was still close, judges dismissed new Trump or Republican cases quickly on Thursday.
Georgia Judge James F. Bass on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit filed a day earlier by state Republicans to prevent the "unlawful counting of ballots received after the election" in Savannah, after a poll watcher for the party allegedly viewed unprocessed absentee ballots mixed in with absentee ballots that were set to be tabulated.
And in Michigan, a state court judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Trump campaign that asked for an immediate halt to the vote counting until its representatives had "meaningful" access to ballot counting and adjudication.
Judge Cynthia Stephens was highly skeptical throughout the virtual hearing about the lack of admissible evidence in the case and whether the campaign had sued the right party, the secretary of state.
"What I have is, at best, a hearsay affidavit that addresses a harm that would be significant," said Stephens. "We've got an affidavit that is not firsthand knowledge."
She said she was not convinced the campaign's claims could succeed in court.